PEOPLE & VOICES
Russia says it rehearsed delivering a massive retaliatory nuclear strike.
In a show of power that coincides with Moscow’s de-ratification of a historic nuclear test moratorium pact, Russia has successfully shown its capacity to launch a large retaliatory nuclear strike by land, sea, and air, according to a Kremlin statement on Wednesday.
The drill, which featured missile launches from long-range bomber aircraft, a nuclear submarine, and a land-based silo, coincides with Moscow’s perception of an existential confrontation with the West over Ukraine.
Russia, which has the biggest nuclear arsenal in the world, is acting swiftly to retract its ratification of a nuclear test moratorium pact to align itself with the United States as tensions reach their highest point since the 1962 Cuban missile crisis.
The nuclear drills included “practical launches of ballistic and cruise missiles,” according to a statement from the Kremlin.
According to State TV, Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu reported to Putin via video connection about the drill, stating that it was a practice for “a massive nuclear strike” in retaliation for a nuclear assault by an enemy.
According to a statement from the Kremlin, a nuclear-powered submarine fired a ballistic missile from the Barents Sea, a Tu-95MS long-range bomber tested air-launched cruise missiles, and a Yars intercontinental ballistic missile was shot from a test facility at a target in Russia’s far east.
“In the course of the events, the level of preparedness of the military command authorities and the skills of the senior and operational staff in organizing subordinate troops (forces) were tested,” added the statement.
“The tasks planned in the course of the training exercise were fully accomplished.”
The practice was captured on video, which the defense ministry released. It included nuclear-capable bomber planes taking off from an airport in the dark and land- and submarine-based missiles loudly racing over the night sky.
Russia periodically conducts these drills to test its so-called nuclear triad. Additionally, the US regularly conducts nuclear drills.
Despite being de-ratified, Russia has made it plain that it does not intend to lift the 1992 prohibition on nuclear test explosions by the Comprehensive Test Prohibition Treaty (CTBT), which Moscow has ratified.
Moscow has stated that it would only resume such testing if the United States initiated it, which Western military analysts think Russia would be tempted to undertake to convey intent and inspire panic in any confrontation with the West.
Russia claims it is merely withdrawing from the CTBT to align itself with Washington, which signed the agreement but never ratified it.
OPINION
In Russia, some women demand the return of their men from the Ukraine front.
Maria Andreeva, whose husband has been fighting in Ukraine for more than a year, is also fighting a struggle in Moscow: she is trying to bring him back home without his being killed.
No one else is with her. A growing number of Russian women are requesting that President Vladimir Putin’s order to mobilize their husbands, sons, and brothers in September of the previous year bring them home from the front lines.
The movement first pledged its allegiance to what the Kremlin refers to as its “special military operation” (SVO), but what they see to be the little reaction they have gotten is making some of their ideas more rigid.
Two brief visits to see his wife and little daughter have been the only times Andreeva’s husband has been to the country since he was called up for military service and sent to Ukraine a year ago. According to his wife, this is not enough for a soldier fighting beside him in combat.
“We want our men to be demobilized so that they can return home because we think that for over a year they have done everything they could have—or even more,” Andreeva, who is 34 years old, said in an interview with Reuters in Moscow.
“For me, it is not only a struggle to ensure that my daughter has a father, but it is also a struggle for my marriage.”
Regarding dealing with the movement, the Kremlin is in a fragile position.
In previous conflicts, Moscow has permitted more outstanding death tolls than would be politically acceptable in Western nations. In February 2022, Moscow dispatched tens of thousands of troops to Ukraine. Additionally, Moscow has tolerated higher death tolls in prior wars.
The increasing movement of Russian women, on the other hand, highlights the inherent inequity and difficulty of maintaining so many men at war for such a long period while still allowing many more men of fighting age to remain at home.
When the Soviet Union was falling apart, groups of mothers of Russian troops campaigned for improved living circumstances for their sons who were serving in the military. This effort continued after their boys returned from fighting in the Chechen area of Russia.
According to the authorities, Russian society is unified behind the war effort; nonetheless, it is too soon to evaluate the magnitude of the movement of Russian women or the influence it will have. Additionally, women in Ukraine have demanded that their husbands be allowed to return from the front lines.
When Andreeva was asked about the risks associated with speaking out in Russia during the conflict, she responded, “I want you to understand: it is no longer scary because it is just not possible to put up with all of this any longer.” It is just an excessive amount.”
The news agency Reuters did not seek out or get any information from Andreeva that may be considered military or potentially sensitive. She requested her spouse’s identity.
Is it loyal?
In September 2022, when Putin issued an order for a partial mobilization of 300,000 reservists, hundreds of thousands of young men fled Russia. Millions of people did not evacuate, and some served in the military.
Since then, Russia has used the promise of high salaries to entice hundreds of thousands of contract soldiers to join its various military units in the regions. The fact that Russia has already recruited 452,000 contract troops this year demonstrates Russia’s numerical edge over Ukraine, as stated by Dmitry Medvedev, the former president of Russia who is currently the deputy head of Russia’s Security Council.
According to Andreeva, the ladies have had very little engagement from the Russian defense ministry, and the petitions that were sent to get their men have received absolutely no reaction.
An inquiry from Reuters for a comment was not met with a response from the ministry.
According to Andreeva, the absence of a reaction has caused some women to alter their perspectives on the dispute and cease acting like “good girls” in response to their requests.
“Our position at the start was: Yes, we understand why it is needed; we support it; we occupy a rather loyal position,” according to her. “But now the position, including mine, is changing because we see how we are being treated and how our husbands are being treated.”
We could not obtain permission from the authorities to proceed with the demonstrations that the ladies had planned. Andreeva stated that the ladies have been accused of having been supported by opposition groups and dissidents headquartered in the West, which are accusations that have no basis in reality.
Twenty-three thousand people are members of their “Way Home” Telegram channel.
Are you saying, “GOOD GIRLS”?
Last month, two ladies bombarded politician Vitaly Milonov with direct questions regarding the return of their men. The bluntness of their questions pierced his attempts to brush away their inquiries with words about his patriotism.
“We are all Russian here,” one person said in an online video clip. “When will the mobilised be changed over?”
“There will, of course, be a changeover,” the speaker said. We shall emerge triumphant for all of us.” As Milonov put it,
“Oh, we have heard all of that before,” the woman remarked through interjection.
One of the most significant complaints that Andreeva, along with other spouses, mothers, and sisters, has is that the weight of war is not distributed fairly. At the same time that expensive restaurants in Moscow will be serving good wine and truffles over the New Year holiday season, some guys are in trenches at the front, fighting for their lives.
“We have 1 percent of the population taking on the whole burden of the SVO at the front while the other 99% are preparing for New Year and having some fun.” According to Andreeva,
“Having fun is not what is in store for our boys or our families.”
people
ICC prosecutor to visit Israel at request of Oct. 7 Hamas attack victims
According to a statement released by the International Criminal Court (ICC) on Thursday, Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan is now in Israel at the request of Israeli survivors and the relatives of victims of the Hamas strikes that occurred in Gaza on October 7.
According to the International Criminal Court (ICC), Khan will also go to Ramallah, located in the occupied West Bank, to meet with senior Palestinian leaders.
On the other hand, the International Criminal Court (ICC) stated that the visit will not be an investigation and that it “represents an opportunity to express sympathy for all victims and engage in dialogue.”
A petition was submitted to the International Criminal Court (ICC) by Israeli relatives of victims of the Hamas assaults, requesting that the court order an inquiry into the deaths and kidnappings.
The families had persuaded Khan to concentrate his inquiry on the activities that Hamas had undertaken in southern Israel on October 7. These actions included enforced disappearances, which the court considers to be a crime against humanity.
Israel has reported that Hamas gunmen have murdered 1,200 people and taken 240 hostages. According to Palestinian health officials whom the United Nations considers to be reputable, this spurred Israel to launch a counterattack from the air and the ground, which resulted in the verified deaths of more than 15,000 Gazans. Another 6,500 people have gone missing, and it is believed that many of them are still trapped under the wreckage.
ECONOMY
Nepal registers first same-sex marriage; ‘historic,’ say activists.
It has been five months since the Supreme Court of Nepal issued an interim decision that cleared the way for same-sex marriages in the predominantly conservative country of Nepal. On Wednesday, local authorities in a village in Nepal recognized the first marriage between people of the same gender in the Himalayan nation, according to officials and campaigners.
The marriage between Surendra Pandey, 26, who was born and identified as male, and Ram Bahadur (Maya) Gurung, 36, who was born male but identified as female, was legally recorded at the Dordi rural municipality office in the Lumjung district in west Nepal, according to an official. Gurung was born male but identifies as female.
We both feel a great deal of joy. In the same way that we are, everyone else in our community is also content,” Pandey said during a phone conversation.
Kathmandu, the nation’s capital, was the location of the couple’s wedding in 2016, which was done according to Hindu rites. The pair had been in a relationship for nine years.
“We have issued the marriage registration certificate to the couple in consideration of the Supreme Court order and instructions from relevant government authorities,” said Hem Raj Kafle, the chief administrative officer of the Dordi rural municipality. “We have released the certificate to the couple.”
In June, the Supreme Court of the Nation issued an interim ruling that allows same-sex couples to register their marriages while they wait for a final verdict.
It was a triumph for sexual and gender minorities, who have long desired equal rights, including recognition of their weddings, according to Sunil Babu Pant, the founder of the Blue Diamond Society, which is Nepal’s premier homosexual rights organization. Pant stated that it was a success for these groups.
“It is historic,” said former politician Pant, pointing out that it was the first registration of its kind in South Asia. “It will open the door for them to jointly open bank accounts and own and transfer property like just any other couple.”
In the region of Asia, where societies are still predominantly traditional, Taiwan is the only other nation that has legalized marriage between people of the same gender.
A majority of Hindus. Nepal has grown increasingly progressive since the Maoist insurgency that had been going on for ten years ended in 2006. One of the most critical demands of the Maoists, whose leading commander is currently serving as prime minister and running a coalition government with the Nepali Congress party, was to remove the Hindu monarchy, which had been in existence for 239 years. Two years later, political parties decided to abolish the monarchy.