From 370 applications, the U.S. Commerce Department announced on Monday that it had selected 31 regional tech centers. These places are now eligible for $500 million in government financing to support innovation and growth in various industries.

According to Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo, the program aims to diversify the American economy away from traditional tech strongholds like Silicon Valley, Seattle, and Boston.

“Those tech ecosystems are concentrated in just a few places around the country,” Raimondo stated. They don’t accurately represent our nation’s potential. They don’t have a monopoly on brilliant concepts.

To encourage greater private sector investment in sectors like the manufacture of semiconductors, clean energy, and batteries for electric vehicles, President Joe Biden believes that the government should help support important sectors.

The regional technology initiative, according to Lael Brainard, National Economic Director for the White House, “makes smart public investments in critical technologies in every region of the country.”

This month, the Biden administration announced that seven “hydrogen hubs” in 16 states would split $7 billion to help the new business get off the ground.

The designated regional tech clusters are concentrated on fields like semiconductors, clean energy, essential minerals, biotechnology, artificial intelligence, and quantum computing. They are in states including Montana, Wisconsin, upstate New York, Vermont, Illinois, and Puerto Rico.

“People shouldn’t have to move to get a good job,” Raimondo added, pointing out that many centers are in small communities.

While an Oklahoma center aims to commercialize autonomous systems in industries like agriculture and pipeline inspections, Washington state and Idaho hubs will concentrate on creating new materials for more fuel-efficient next-generation airplanes. Personalized medicine is being developed as part of a Wisconsin effort.

No classification as a hub ensures federal money.

According to Raimondo, the government would give up to $75 million to each of the 31 IT clusters the following year.

As part of the historic “Chips and Science” law, which allocates $52 billion for American semiconductor manufacture and research to better compete with China, Congress granted $500 million for the initiative in August 2022.

This year, Biden requested $4 billion from Congress to support more local tech clusters. Congress has not yet approved a full-year budget for the current fiscal year.

Two people close to Foxconn (2317. TW), a significant supplier of Apple’s (AAPL.O) iPhones, acknowledged Monday that the company is subject to a tax investigation in China. They claimed that they believed a state-backed tabloid had published the investigation for political reasons related to Taiwan’s impending elections.

China’s state-backed Global Times newspaper said on Sunday that the country’s natural resources department had undertaken on-the-ground investigations into the usage of land by Foxconn firms in the provinces of Henan and Hubei, among other places, and that several of the company’s important Chinese subsidiaries were the subject of tax audits.

Due to the delicacy of the situation, the two sources asked to remain anonymous. They claimed that Chinese authorities had audited several corporations recently, but according to their belief, only Foxconn’s investigation had been made public.

According to the sources, the audits are taking place as Foxconn tries to increase manufacturing outside of China less than three months before Taiwan’s presidential election.

Taiwan’s administration routinely charges Beijing with trying to use military or economic pressure to alter the results of its elections to achieve a result favorable to China. Taiwan is a territory that China claims as its own.

Terry Gou, the creator of Foxconn and the last CEO of the business, is running for president as an independent.

By running, Gou would split the opposition vote, perhaps securing a victory for current Vice President Lai Ching-te, who is currently ahead in the polls, The Global Times said in an English-language article late on Sunday.

Beijing hates Lai because it sees him as a separatist. He claims Beijing has rejected his offers of dialogue, and Beijing alone can decide Taiwan’s destiny.

Gou’s decision to run for office “is likely to further split the island’s opposition camp, and this will ultimately favor secessionist ruling Democratic Progressive Party candidate Lai Ching-te,” the Global Times cited unidentified analysts.

IMPROVEMENT OUTSIDE OF CHINA

The Chinese government has made no formal announcement on the audits of Foxconn.

Local officials in the provinces of Henan, Hubei, Guangdong, and Jiangsu, who the Global Times claimed were carrying out the audits and investigations, did not immediately reply to faxed requests for comment from Reuters.

Previously known as Hon Hai Precision Industry Co Ltd, Foxconn employs hundreds of thousands of people in China and is a significant investor there. Beijing frequently cites Foxconn as an example of Taiwanese investors’ success in the nation.

The business has been working hard to diversify its production base outside of China, and the first source told Reuters that they saw the audit as a “warning” to Foxconn.

Their economy is struggling. Seeing big corporations like us go to India is a warning,” the person claimed.

They demand that you choose a side. The first source stated, “You may either stay with us or go.

The audit was “unexpected” and “relatively unusual,” according to the second source.

In a statement released on Sunday, Foxconn stated that adhering to the law was a “fundamental principle” of its business practices and that it would “actively cooperate with the relevant units on the related work and operations.”

Foxconn declared it had no more comments on Monday.

Requests for a response from China’s Taiwan Affairs Office were not immediately fulfilled. The Taiwanese government assisted Foxconn, but Premier Chen Chien-jen did not specify how.

On Monday, the price of Foxconn shares fell 2.9%, outperforming the decline of the broader market (.TWII) of 1.2%.

Election on “WAR OR PEACE”

Gou, the wealthy creator of Foxconn, has fallen behind in the polls despite waging a prominent presidential campaign.

He claims that only with his broad professional and social connections in China and the United States can he keep the peace after the island’s dominant Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) brought the region to the verge of conflict with China through its antagonistic policies.

Huang Shih-hsiu, a spokeswoman for Gou’s campaign, directed inquiries about the Foxconn investigation to the business, noting that Gou was no longer on the board and was now merely a stakeholder.

But today, the Foxconn investigation is a political topic.

When questioned about the Foxconn investigation on Monday, Hou Yu-ih, the presidential candidate for Taiwan’s largest opposition party, the Kuomintang, which has framed the election as a “war or peace” vote, stated that Taiwan corporations fear the most instability between Taiwan and China.

The DPP candidate Lai, who is now in the lead in the polls, said the Chinese news on the inquiry was “unexpected” and “regretful” in his speech at a rally on Sunday.

On Monday, DPP spokesperson Chang Chih-hao stated that “Taiwanese businesses have always contributed to China’s economic development.”

“However, the Chinese communists often use Taiwanese businesses as a bargaining chip for political pressure or election interference against Taiwan.”

Following similar actions taken by authorities in Europe and other major economies, Japan’s competition watchdog announced on Monday that it had opened an investigation into Google (GOOGL.O) for a potential violation of anti-monopoly rules in web search services.

According to the Japan Fair Trade Commission (JFTC), it is being looked into whether Google violated the country’s antimonopoly act by giving Android smartphone manufacturers a portion of its income in exchange for not installing competing search engines.

It is also investigating Google’s practice of forcing manufacturers of Android phones to include the “Google Play” app with the “Google Search” and “Google Chrome” browser apps.

“There is suspicion that through these steps it is excluding competitors’ business activity and restricting its business partners’ business activity in the search services market,” a representative of the JFTC stated at a news conference.

The representative claimed that while Google’s service was extensively utilized, the issue was actually with fair competition.

“We’ve launched this probe wondering if the situation under which other search engine providers’ services have a hard time being recognized as a user’s choice, no matter how much improvement has been made, is artificially created.”

The judgment comes after related inquiries by antitrust officials in the United States, the European Union, and other countries.