Connect with us

Congress

US Senate Rejects Proposal to Allow FBI Access to Web Searches Without Court Orders

Published

on

On Wednesday the US Senate repudiated a measure that would grant the FBI access to an individuals ‘Web’ activities, such as Internet browsing history and email information, without a sanctioned court order in regards to terrorism and spy cases.

Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John McCain and Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr both endorsed this potential bill that would have seen the FBI given even greater powers.

Arguing that such a bill is necessary in light of the Orlando terrorist attack, McCain and Burr advocated that unless additional security measures are implemented attacks similar to the attack at the Pulse club would most likely occur again.

The terrorist attack at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando was conducted by a supposed ;lone’ wolf who later claimed to support the Islamic State ideology. Over 49 people were killed during the shooting and over 50 were injured.

McCain and Burr highlight this attack as a paradigm, a reason why the FBI should be given more resources and capabilities to deny the chances for additional attacks from occurring.

However, out of the fear of government intrusion and the loss of privacy rights, the bill did not succeed in getting passed. It fell short of 60 votes, receiving nearly 58 of them.

Lawmakers have attempted to pass a similar measure this year in the House that would have given authorities the ability to access email information, but it also faced harsh criticism from proponents of privacy.

FBI Director James Comey has said that the number one priority of the bureau is to be able to obtain a user’s complete internet data because in not be able to do so, it “affects out work in a very, very big and practical way.”

While many would agree that the FBI would be able to do their job easier with such a bill, it is unsettling for the many American citizens who view this as yet another attempt by the government to have access to private information. People are worried that they could be targeted by the government without probable cause, thus acquiescing their rights on a grand scale.

Opponents of this bill in the Senate argue that this bill is unnecessary and stems down to the “FBI not wanting to do paperwork.” Senator Ron Wyden, one of the most prolific advocates of privacy rights in the Senate, mentioned that the FBI “has the power to demand these electronic records with a court order” and that they could, in the event of an emergency, bypass this court order requirement.

Organizations like the ACLU, Microsoft, Yahoo, and Google oppose such bills and has voiced opposition to them in the past. The ACLU took aim specifically at the “lone wolf” surveillance section of the bill, saying that lone wolf surveillance “is unnecessary to provide the government the tools necessary to prevent terrorism.”

Concerned with the potential to destroy all reforms made to the Patriot Act last year, the ACLU stands firmly against this bill and has been lobbying members of Congress to fight against them as well.

Faced with such opposition, McCain and Burr will need to go back to the drawing board and formulate a way to successfully get a similar bill passed. However, with the nervous atmosphere in regards to privacy in the United States, it seems unlikely that any type of bill that relinquishes privacy rights will be ratified any time soon.

 

Featured Image by pixabay.com

AFRICA

President’s “Non-Starter” Deal Will Not End Shutdown

Published

on

This week, shutdown polls showed the American public blame President Trump for the government shutdown. To divert Americans’ attention elsewhere, President Trump tried to make a deal with Democrats on Saturday. Among other elements, the deal consists of three years’ legislative relief to DACA recipients and a three-year extension of temporary protected status for 300,000 immigrants whose protected status is about to expire. In exchange for these provisions, $5.7 billion border wall funding will finally be paid for. The so-called deal is a non-starter because it contains the wall House Speaker Pelosi refuses to compromise on. Moreover, Democrats seek to reopen government before beginning negotiations on border security. Democrats are presenting a united front and refusing to budge on the wall together, at least until the government is opened.

To Pelosi, the wall is an expensive and unnecessary item border security can do perfectly fine without. To President Trump, the wall is an integral part of his campaign promise and essential to seal off the border, stopping illegal crooks and helping border security officials do their jobs.

Support for the wall is clearly divided along partisan lines. Many Republican lawmakers, including Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, supported President Trump’s latest proposal. McConnell said he will floor Trump’s proposal in the Senate next week. Sen. Mitt Romney is also in favor of the proposal. House Republicans too considered Trump’s deal to be bipartisan, fair, and reasonable.

Speaker Pelosi said any one item in the deal was not likely to pass the House, let alone the compilation of all items. Moreover, Trump’s proposal does not offer a permanent solution to Dreamers and TPS recipients. Dreamers and TPS recipients had their protections initially removed by President Trump. President Trump’s deal with the Democrats can hardly be called a deal at all considering the Democrats were not consulted before Trump’s announcement and none of their policy demands were met. His proposal is a consolidation of items Democrats previously voted for and band-aid solutions to Democratic immigration priorities.

Other Democrats such as Sen. Tim Kaine and Mark Werner, both of whom represent Virginia where many federal workers reside, were displeased President Trump did not address the sufferings of federal workers going without pay. Without their paychecks, federal workers, who tend to be paid less overall, can barely make ends meet with mortgage and child care payments. There is increasing dependence on food banks. The government shutdown enters its 29th day.

 

Featured image via Flickr/The White House

Continue Reading

AFRICA

Young Man Who Targeted the White House Arrested

Published

on

US Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia, Byung J. Pak, announced the arrest of a man plotting to blow a hole through the White House for access and subsequently corner people inside with semi-automatic rifles. The backpack he was supposed to wear would have contained a bomb for him to become a “martyr”.

Hasher Taheb, 21, is from Cumming, Georgia. He plotted to attack the White House, the Statue of Liberty, and other locations in Washington, D.C. Taheb was investigated by the Atlanta Joint Terrorism Task Force and the FBI for a year after a community member gave local authorities the hint Taheb was becoming a dangerous radical. The tip, given in March 2018, said Taheb had, “become radicalized, changed his name, and made plans to travel abroad.”

In July, Taheb applied for a US passport and put his car on sale. Taheb told an FBI informant who showed interest in buying the car that he was selling the car to pay for his trip abroad to ISIS-controlled territories. He teamed up with this FBI informant and relayed to him his passion for jihad along with the targets he had in mind.

On December 2, Taheb met with the informant and an undercover FBI agent. He communicated his desire to be a “martyr” and inflict as much damage as possible in the US. Taheb drew a diagram of the West Wing in the White House and requested assistance in obtaining weapons and explosive devices from the undercover agent on December 7. On December 15, Taheb uploaded a 40-page manifesto about jihad to Google Docs and started a group chat with the informant and undercover agent for discussing imminent attacks planned.

On Saturday, Taheb met the FBI informant and informed him he was going to initiate attacks on Thursday. On Wednesday, Taheb and the two FBI associates conferred in a store parking lot located in Buford, Georgia to exchange their automobiles for rifles and explosives. A second FBI informant joined them and instructed Taheb on how to use the weapons. Taheb was arrested at the scene after he gave away his car keys and took the explosives he was promised, transferring them to a rental vehicle. Chris Hacker, head of Atlanta’s FBI branch, said authorities think Taheb was acting alone aside from the FBI associates Taheb expected to carry out his plans with.

Taheb appeared in an Atlanta court, charged with attempts to damage federal properties using improvised explosives. Pak said prosecutors will bring the case before a grand jury. Taheb will next appear in court on January 24 at 3:00 p.m. ET.

 

Featured image via Flickr/The White House

Continue Reading

AFRICA

Congressional Democrats Refuse Trump’s Invitation to Discuss Shutdown

Published

on

Moderate Democrats were invited to have lunch with President Trump and House Republicans on Tuesday. Reps. J. Luis Correa (D-Calif.), Stephanie Murphy (D-Fla.), Abigail Spanberger (D- Va.), and Rep. Charlie Crist (D-Fla.) were invited to the lunch. Two are leaders of the centrist Blue Dog Coalition. These Democrats, suspecting they will be used as pawns in the political impasse against House Speaker Nancy Pelosi- who is hell-bent on dismissing the notion of a border wall once and for all- declined lunch with the President.

President Trump has been blaming the Democrats for the government shutdown but press reports show otherwise. Previously, President Trump walked out of a meeting and threatened to veto bipartisan legislation if there is not a wall involved. Now, however, the tables have turned and his attempts to make peace with a lunch at the White House were rebuffed.

The Democrats Trump targeted for his lunch were firmly against the wall and discussion during a single lunch would not have changed their minds. Yet, on Tuesday, President Trump invited additional Democratic House members for a meeting on Wednesday. Lately, White House strategy was to pin the shutdown on Democrats and fragment the Party for his wall. He has not succeeded in turning Democrats against each other so far. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) is not budging from his position and stands with House Speaker Pelosi.

On Tuesday, a lawsuit brought by the union representing air traffic controllers and other federal workers was rejected by a federal judge, Richard J. Leon. He refused to give an order allowing thousands of federal workers to stop working. And about 50,000 furloughed employees, out of 800,000 total, were compelled to return to work without pay.

Democrats and Republicans alike think a short-term reopening of the government is for the best. Democrats want parts of the government that have nothing to do with border security reopened and Republicans like Sen. Lindsey Graham seek to write a letter to President Trump advising the government be reopened and funds for border security increased while negotiations continue. On Monday, President Trump blew off Graham’s suggestion.

The House is assessing short-term spending bills to reopen the government as soon as possible but Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) will not pass any legislation that does not meet Trump’s approval and fails to move President Trump’s policies along. On Tuesday, McConnell, without a second thought, dismissed any possibility of the Senate overriding President Trump’s veto on proposed legislation to reopen the government.

Congressional recesses scheduled for next week were canceled as the shutdown reaches 25 days.

 

Featured image via Wikimedia

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending